No significant difference: use of statistical methods for testing equivalence in clinical veterinary literature
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
- Vol. 222 (4) , 433-437
- https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2003.222.433
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- A practical approach for evaluating population and individual bioequivalenceStatistics in Medicine, 2000
- Measuring agreement in method comparison studiesStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 1999
- CLINICAL EQUIVALENCEJournal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 1999
- On the use of the ratio or the odds ratio of cure rates in therapeutic equivalence clinical trials with binary endpointsJournal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 1998
- Statistics notes: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absenceBMJ, 1995
- Statistical aspects of bioequivalence—a reviewXenobiotica, 1992
- Test statistics and sample size formulae for comparative binomial trials with null hypothesis of non‐zero risk difference or non‐unity relative riskStatistics in Medicine, 1990
- A comparison of the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure and the Power Approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailabilityJournal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 1987
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986