The Return of the Group
- 1 December 1996
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Philosophy of Science
- Vol. 63 (4) , 562-584
- https://doi.org/10.1086/289977
Abstract
Once upon a time in evolutionary theory, everything happened for the best. Predators killed only the old or the sick. Pecking orders and other dominance hierarchies minimized wasteful conflict within the group. Male displays ensured that only the best and the fittest had mates. In the culmination of this tradition, Wynne-Edwards (1962, 1986) argued that many species have mechanisms that ensure groups do not over-exploit their resource base. The “central function” of territoriality in birds and other higher animals is “of limiting the numbers of occupants per unit area of habitat” (1986, 6). Species with dominance hierarchies, species with lekking breeding systems, and species with communal breeding regulate their populations. These social mechanisms have population regulation as their “underlying primary function” (1986, 9). Wynne-Edwards argued that these mechanisms evolve through group selection. Populations without such mechanisms are apt to go extinct by eroding their own resource base.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciencesBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1994
- Burying the vehicleBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1994
- E pluribus unum?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1994
- Taking vechicles seriouslyBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1994
- Weak Altruism, Strong Group SelectionOikos, 1990
- Reviving the superorganismJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1989
- The Return of the GeneThe Journal of Philosophy, 1988
- Soft Selection, Hard Selection, Kin Selection, and Group SelectionThe American Naturalist, 1985
- Group selection is implicated in the evolution of female-biased sex ratiosNature, 1981
- Group Selection and Kin SelectionNature, 1964