Situational and topical variations in credibility criteria
- 1 March 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Monographs
- Vol. 45 (1) , 85-92
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757809375954
Abstract
This study tested the hypothesis that credibility criteria (scales) differ in their sensitivity to topic‐situations. Fifty‐one scales, including nine marker scales identified by previous research, were tested across four topic‐situations. Forty‐one of the scales, including seven of the nine marker scales, were found to differ significantly across the four topic‐situations. Of the ten scales that behaved consistently across topic‐situations, at least two were so close to a neutral rating that they might have been considered by judges irrelevant to credibility.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- A constructivist analysis of the concept of credibilityQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1976
- The ideal source: A reexamination of source credibility measurementCentral States Speech Journal, 1976
- Dimensions of source credibility: A test for reproducibilitySpeech Monographs, 1973
- Scales for the measurement ofethos:Another attemptSpeech Monographs, 1972
- Scale values for highest and lowest levels of credibilityCentral States Speech Journal, 1972
- The factor structure of source credibility as a function of the speaking situationSpeech Monographs, 1972
- Reliability of semantic differential scales: The role of factor analysisWestern Speech, 1971
- Dimensions for Evaluating the Acceptability of Message SourcesPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1969
- Factors of source credibilityQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1968
- Scales for the measurement of ethosSpeech Monographs, 1966