Incorporating Variation in Occupation Span into Settlement-Pattern Analysis
- 1 October 1991
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Antiquity
- Vol. 56 (4) , 604-620
- https://doi.org/10.2307/281539
Abstract
Settlement patterns recovered by archaeologists differ fundamentally from synchronic settlement patterns analyzed by geographers since they are a static record of occupations that may often have had differing periods of use in the past. Many maps of the “settlement pattern” of prehistoric phases show more occupations than were ever simultaneously occupied. After discussing some of the problems this can cause, I describe a way of characterizing past settlement dynamics and a method for estimating (1) the mean number of likely simultaneous occupations for a region and (2) phase-to-phase differences in mean occupation span. The method is illustrated by the analysis of settlement data from the Ixtapalapa region in the Basin of Mexico.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Monitoring Mississippian Homestead Occupation Span and Economy Using Ceramic RefuseAmerican Antiquity, 1989
- The Contemporaneity ProblemAmerican Antiquity, 1984
- Surveys and Archaeological ResearchAnnual Review of Anthropology, 1981
- Ethnoarchaeology and Settlement ArchaeologyEthnohistory, 1973
- Prehispanic Adaptation in the Ixtapalapa Region, MexicoScience, 1972