Nifedipine Versus Propranolol for the Initial Prophylaxis of Migraine
- 1 April 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain
- Vol. 29 (4) , 215-218
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.1989.hed22904215.x
Abstract
We conducted a randomized open-labled study of nifedipine versus propranolol for the initial prophylaxis of migraine. Propranolol was effective in 67% or patients (12/18) and well tolerated. Nifedipine was effective in only 30% of patients (6/20). The lack of overall efficacy of nefedipine was attributable to a high incidence of side effects, including an unusual symptom complex resembling erythromelialgia. These side effects led 45% (9/20) of the nifedipine patients to withdraw from the study within two seeks. By contrast, no patient (0/18) withdrew from the study within the first 2 weeks of propranolol therapy. We conclude that nifedipine is not an agent of first choice for the prophylaxis of migraine.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nifedipine in the prophylaxis of classic migraineNeurology, 1989
- Treatment of Complicated Migraine with Sublingual NifedipineHeadache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 1987
- Efficacy, Side Effects and Tolerance Compared During Headache Treatment With Three Different Calcium BlockersHeadache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 1987
- Migraine and Cluster Headache Treatment With Calcium Antagonists Supports a Vascular PathogenesisHeadache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 1985
- Nifedipine and ErythromelalgiaAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1983
- Nifedipine and ErythromelalgiaAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1983
- Flunarizine, a Calcium Channel Blocker: a New Prophylactic Drug in MigraineHeadache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 1983
- Autonomic innervation of the skin in primary erythermalgiaArchives of Dermatology, 1983
- A Double‐blind Placebo‐controlled Prophylactic Study of Flunarizine (Sibelium®) in MigraineHeadache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 1981