The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function
- 1 June 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Vol. 13 (2) , 201-233
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00078407
Abstract
This article examines the role of attention and automaticity in auditory processing as revealed by event-related potential (ERP) research. An ERP component called themismatch negativity, generated by the brain's automatic response to changes in repetitive auditory input, reveals that physical features of auditory stimuli are fully processed whether or not they are attended. It also suggests that there exist precise neuronal representations of the physical features of recent auditory stimuli, perhaps the traces underlying acoustic sensory (“echoic”) memory. A mechanism of passive attention switching in response to changes in repetitive input is also implicated.Conscious perception of discrete acoustic stimuli might be mediated by some of the mechanisms underlying another ERP component (NI), one sensitive to stimulus onset and offset. Frequent passive attentional shifts might accountforthe effect cognitive psychologists describe as “the breakthrough of the unattended” (Broadbent 1982), that is, that even unattended stimuli may be semantically processed, without assuming automatic semantic processing or late selection in selective attention.Theprocessing negativitysupports the early-selection theory and may arise from a mechanism for selectively attending to stimuli defined by certain features. This stimulus selection occurs in the form ofa matching process in which each input is compared with the “attentional trace,” a voluntarily maintained representation of the task-relevant features of the stimulus to be attended. The attentional mechanism described might underlie the stimulus-set mode of attention proposed by Broadbent. Finally, a model of automatic and attentional processing in audition is proposed that is based mainly on the aforementioned ERP components and some other physiological measures.Keywords
This publication has 309 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the nonselectivity of "selective" seeing: Contrasts between interference and priming in selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1989
- Intracortical connections and their physiological correlates in the primary auditory cortex (AI) of the catJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1988
- Effects of attending selectively to the spatial position of reflex-eliciting and reflex-modulating stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1987
- Reply to Matthei: We really is worse than you or them, and so are ma and pa.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1983
- A time-course analysis of attentional tuning of the auditory evoked responseExperimental Brain Research, 1982
- Length effects in word perception: We is better than I but worse than you or them.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1982
- Semantic context and the encoding of words: Evidence for two modes of stimulus analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981
- Sources and terminations of callosal axons related to binaural and frequency maps in primary auditory cortex of the catJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1978
- Single-unit activity in the auditory cortex of monkeys selectively attending left vs. right ear stimuliBrain Research, 1978
- Relation between the time-course of Hoffmann-reflexes and the foreperiod duration in a reaction-time taskPhysiology & Behavior, 1973