The Impact of Detubularization on Ileal Reservoirs

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
For many years, parts of the large or small bowel have been used for bladder augmentation and substitution. Recent controversy over the advantages and disadvantages of continent urinary diversion using detubularized ileum (the Kock pouch) and tubular ileum (the Camey procedure) focussed on how a highly compliant urinary reservoir should be formed. We compared the compliance of isolated intact ileal segments and ileal pouches constructed after transection of the antimesenteric border. Hydrodynamic data was obtained at four different points in time: acute (immediately after pouch construction), and after two, six and twelve weeks. Over the first six weeks the reservoirs were connected to the bladder for drainage. At six weeks, subtotal cystectomy and separate anastomosis of the tubular ileal loop and the detubularized ileal pouch to the trigone was performed to study the influence of cyclic reservoir distention. Statistical analysis of the pressure-volume curves revealed significantly better compliance of the detubularized ileal pouch as compared to the intact ileal segments. The area under the pressure curve values (AUC) were p < 0.025, p < 0.02, p < 0.005 and p < 0.02 for the acute experiment, after two weeks, after six weeks, and after 12 weeks respectively. Our findings suggest that transection of the circular intestinal wall is an important step in the creation of a good-compliant urinary reservoir.