Drop Formation and Impaction on the Plant
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- symposium
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Weed Technology
- Vol. 2 (1) , 82-87
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0890037x00030153
Abstract
The effect of variables that influence the retention of spray droplets impacting on leaf surfaces was studied, using a uniform-size droplet generator to produce drops ranging from 63 to 545 μm diam. To observe the impaction of spray droplets more easily and to measure their velocity before and after impaction, high-speed motion photography (6000 frames/sec) was used. Rebound of spray droplets depends on the micro-structure of the target surface. Leaf surfaces of several crops and weeds reflected 63 to 545 μm diam water drops traveling at velocities less than velocities of drops delivered by popular nozzles at commonly used spray pressures. If the concentration is high enough, some surfactants can reduce the rebound of drops. With one surfactant, its concentration had to be much greater than the critical micelle concentration to reduce reflection of spray drops.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Role of Dynamic Surface Tension in the Retention of Surfactant Sprays on Pea PlantsPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2018
- A System for Photographically Studying Droplet Impaction on Leaf SurfacesTransactions of the ASAE, 1986
- Spray impaction, retention and adhesion: An introduction to basic characteristicsPesticide Science, 1984
- Surface tension and contact angle of herbicide solutions affected by surfactantsJournal of Oil & Fat Industries, 1984
- The use of dimensional analysis in a study of drop retention on barleyPesticide Science, 1983
- Source of Uniform-Sized Liquid DropletsReview of Scientific Instruments, 1964
- Physico‐chemical studies on agricultural sprays. IV.—The retention of spray liquids on leaf surfacesJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1962
- Studies on Spray Retention by Leaves of Different PlantsWeeds, 1952