Reaction Time Analysis of Two Types of Motor Preparation for Speech Articulation: Action as a Sequence of Chunks
- 1 June 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Motor Behavior
- Vol. 35 (2) , 135-150
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00222890309602129
Abstract
Reaction time (RT) prior to speech articulation increased as a function of response complexity. The RT findings formed 2 patterns, each of which was a different Response Complexity × Paradigm (choice RT vs. simple RT) interaction. That result extends previous findings from manual button-pressing tasks (S. T. Klapp, 1995) to a different action modality. Two different types of response programming, INT and SEQ, are assumed in the interpretation. Whereas INT can be identified with response programming within a word, SEQ fits a different interpretation related to timing of onsets of speech units. A critical assumption is that a long response is represented as a sequence of chunks; that organization is subject to manipulation. New findings suggest some modifications of the previous theory.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1998
- The syllable’s role in word namingMemory & Cognition, 1997
- Movement errors and levels of processing in sentence productionJournal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1989
- Distributed Planning of Movement SequencesJournal of Motor Behavior, 1988
- Binary choice reaction time as a criterion of motor equivalenceActa Psychologica, 1982
- Implicit speech: Mechanism in perceptual encoding?Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970
- On the speed of mental processesActa Psychologica, 1969
- Coarticulation of Lip RoundingJournal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1968
- S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953
- On the Rate of Gain of InformationQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1952