Reproducibility and Performance of Virtual Karyotyping With SNP Microarrays for the Detection of Chromosomal Imbalances in Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Tissues
- 1 September 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diagnostic Molecular Pathology
- Vol. 19 (3) , 127-134
- https://doi.org/10.1097/pdm.0b013e3181d527c5
Abstract
Background: Chromosomal imbalances are commonly seen in cancer and inherited genetic diseases. These imbalances may assist in the diagnosis, prognosis, and/or therapeutic management of certain neoplasms. Several methods for detecting chromosomal imbalances, such as, fluorescent in situ hybridization, array comparative genomic hybridization, and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays have proven useful in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Here, we report the performance and reproducibility of virtual karyotyping of FFPE tissues with Affymetrix SNP arrays. Methods: Virtual karyotypes from 442 FFPE tumor samples were generated using the Affymetrix GeneChip Mapping 10K Xba 2.0 and/or 250K Nsp SNP mapping arrays. Samples ranged from a few weeks to 17 years in archival storage. Virtual karyotypes were assessed for copy number changes, loss of heterozygosity, and acquired uniparental disomy. Results: Overall, 75.3% of samples produced interpretable virtual karyotypes with the 10K arrays and 76.7% in the 250K arrays. Parameters for the selection of samples for hybridization were determined, which increased the success rate in both platforms to 81.3 and 92.6%, respectively. FFPE virtual karyotypes generated with both 10K Xba 2.0 and 250K Nsp arrays showed 100% concordance in intralaboratory and interlaboratory reproducibility studies. Samples older than 7 years showed decreased performance. Conclusions: SNP arrays are a reliable, reproducible, and robust platform for the virtual karyotyping of FFPE tumor tissues with performance characteristics adequate for clinical application. Parameters that most significantly affected sample performance were sample age and storage conditions.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognostic Significance of Copy-Number Alterations in Multiple MyelomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- SNP array mapping of chromosome 20p deletions: Genotypes, phenotypes, and copy number variationHuman Mutation, 2009
- Virtual karyotyping with SNP microarrays reduces uncertainty in the diagnosis of renal epithelial tumorsDiagnostic Pathology, 2008
- Advantages and limitations of cytogenetic, molecular cytogenetic, and molecular diagnostic testing in mesenchymal neoplasmsJournal of Orthopaedic Science, 2008
- SNP Array Karyotyping Allows for the Detection of Uniparental Disomy and Cryptic Chromosomal Abnormalities in MDS/MPD-U and MPDPLOS ONE, 2007
- Highly Sensitive Method for Genomewide Detection of Allelic Composition in Nonpaired, Primary Tumor Specimens by Use of Affymetrix Single-Nucleotide–Polymorphism Genotyping MicroarraysAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2007
- Genome-wide Copy Number Profiling on High-density Bacterial Artificial Chromosomes, Single-nucleotide Polymorphisms, and Oligonucleotide Microarrays: A Platform Comparison based on Statistical Power AnalysisDNA Research, 2007
- Genome-Wide, High-Resolution Detection of Copy Number, Loss of Heterozygosity, and Genotypes from Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tumor Tissue Using MicroarraysCancer Research, 2007
- Application of Genome-Wide Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Typing: Simple Association and BeyondPLoS Genetics, 2006
- Structural variation in the human genomeNature Reviews Genetics, 2006