The TAPS Project. 13: Clinical and Social Outcomes of Long-Stay Psychiatric Patients After One Year in the Community
- 1 April 1993
- journal article
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in The British Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 162 (S19) , 45-56
- https://doi.org/10.1192/s0007125000292258
Abstract
The first prospective, controlled study of a large, long-stay, in-patient population as their hospital services were reprovided in the community is reported. Two-hundred-and-seventy-eight patients were matched individually with similar patients who remained in hospital. Clinical and social outcomes over a one-year follow-up are presented for the first three years of the reprovision process. Compared with matches, the leavers at follow-up had more diverse social networks that contained a higher proportion of contacts named as friends. The care facilities in the community allowed more opportunities for patient autonomy than the hospitals across all aspects of the environments measured. At follow-up, more leavers than matches wanted to remain in their current placement, while fewer leavers than matches said there was nothing they liked about their current placement. More leavers than matches found their medication helpful.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- The physical health of old long stay in-patients in one psychiatric hospitalPsychiatric Bulletin, 1991
- The TAPS Project. 4: An Observational Study of the Social Life of Long-Stay PatientsThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1990
- The TAPS Project. 5: the Structure of Social-Network Data Obtained from Long-Stay PatientsThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1990
- What does community care mean now?BMJ, 1990
- Who needs long term psychiatric care?BMJ, 1990
- Patient power in mental health.BMJ, 1989
- Long-term Psychiatric Patients in the CommunityThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1986
- Schizophrenic Patients Discharged from Hospital—A Follow-up StudyThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1984
- Simultaneous Inference in Epidemiological StudiesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1982
- The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978