Making TDR Work: A Study of Program Implementation
- 30 June 1986
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the American Planning Association
- Vol. 52 (2) , 203-211
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368608976620
Abstract
The earliest transfer of development rights programs performed poorly, largely because they were optional and because local officials had little opportunity to study and refine them. The second-generation programs are more sophisticated and have gone farther toward fulfilling the promise of the TDR concept. After analyzing the implementation of two second-generation programs—in Montgomery County, Maryland, and in the New Jersey Pinelands—this article presents seven propositions outlining the conditions for operation of successful TDR programs.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Design of Programs Using Transferable Development Rights to Preserve Farmland in the NortheastJournal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, 1981
- Approaches to Research on Transferable Development Rights Proposals: An OverviewJournal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, 1979
- "Fair" Compensation and the Accommodation Power: Antidotes for the Taking Impasse in Land Use ControversiesColumbia Law Review, 1975
- The Unconstitutionality of Transferable Development RightsThe Yale Law Journal, 1975
- Transfer of Development Rights: A New Tool for PlannersJournal of the American Institute of Planners, 1975
- Development Rights Transfer: An Exploratory EssayThe Yale Law Journal, 1973
- Development Rights Transfer in New York CityThe Yale Law Journal, 1972
- The Chicago Plan: Incentive Zoning and the Preservation of Urban LandmarksHarvard Law Review, 1972