Endogenous Communication Among Lenders and Entrepreneurial Incentives
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 10 (1) , 205-236
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/10.1.205
Abstract
If banks have an informational monopoly about their clients, borrowers may curtail their effort level for fear of being exploited via high interest rates in the future. Banks can correct this incentive problem by committing to share private information with other lenders. The fiercer competition triggered by information sharing lowers future interest rates and future profits of banks. But, provided banks retain an initial informational advantage, their current profits are raised by the borrowers’ higher effort. This trade-off determines the banks’ willingness to share information. Their decision affects credit market competition, interest rates, volume of lending, and social welfare.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coordination, Commitment, and Enforcement: The Case of the Merchant GuildJournal of Political Economy, 1994
- Information Sharing in Credit MarketsThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- Insiders and Outsiders: The Choice between Informed and Arm's-Length DebtThe Journal of Finance, 1992
- Asymmetric Information, Bank Lending and Implicit Contracts: A Stylized Model of Customer RelationshipsThe Journal of Finance, 1990
- THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS IN THE REVIVAL OF TRADE: THE LAW MERCHANT, PRIVATE JUDGES, AND THE CHAMPAGNE FAIRSEconomics & Politics, 1990
- Second-Sourcing as a Commitment: Monopoly Incentives to Attract CompetitionThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1988
- Licensing to Enhance Demand for New TechnologiesThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1987
- Reputation and Product QualityThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1984
- Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to ReputationsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1983
- The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual PerformanceJournal of Political Economy, 1981