Withdrawal of Mechanical Ventilation in Anticipation of Death in the Intensive Care Unit
Top Cited Papers
- 18 September 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 349 (12) , 1123-1132
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa030083
Abstract
In critically ill patients who are receiving mechanical ventilation, the factors associated with physicians' decisions to withdraw ventilation in anticipation of death are unclear. The objective of this study was to examine the clinical determinants that were associated with the withdrawal of mechanical ventilation. We studied adults who were receiving mechanical ventilation in 15 intensive care units, recording base-line physiological characteristics, daily Multiple Organ Dysfunction Scores, the patient's decision-making ability, the type of life support administered, the use of do-not-resuscitate orders, the physician's prediction of the patient's status, and the physician's perceptions of the patient's preferences about the use of life support. We examined the relation between these factors and withdrawal of mechanical ventilation, using Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis. Of 851 patients who were receiving mechanical ventilation, 539 (63.3 percent) were successfully weaned, 146 (17.2 percent) died while receiving mechanical ventilation, and 166 (19.5 percent) had mechanical ventilation withdrawn. The need for inotropes or vasopressors was associated with withdrawal of the ventilator (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.20 to 2.66; P=0.004), as were the physician's prediction that the patient's likelihood of survival in the intensive care unit was less than 10 percent (hazard ratio, 3.49; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.39 to 8.79; P=0.002), the physician's prediction that future cognitive function would be severely impaired (hazard ratio, 2.51; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.28 to 4.94; P=0.04), and the physician's perception that the patient did not want life support used (hazard ratio, 4.19; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.57 to 6.81; P<0.001). Rather than age or the severity of the illness and organ dysfunction, the strongest determinants of the withdrawal of ventilation in critically ill patients were the physician's perception that the patient preferred not to use life support, the physician's predictions of a low likelihood of survival in the intensive care unit and a high likelihood of poor cognitive function, and the use of inotropes or vasopressors.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Withdrawing and withholding life support in the intensive care unit: a Spanish prospective multi-centre observational studyIntensive Care Medicine, 2001
- End-of-Life Care in the ICUChest, 2000
- A National Survey of End-of-life Care for Critically Ill PatientsAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1998
- Withdrawal and withholding of life support in the intensive care unit: A comparison of teaching and community hospitalsCritical Care Medicine, 1998
- A retrospective review of a large cohort of patients undergoing the process of withholding or withdrawal of life supportCritical Care Medicine, 1997
- Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1997
- Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy in a Canadian intensive care unitCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1995
- Process of forgoing life-sustaining treatment in a university hospitalCritical Care Medicine, 1992
- Withholding and Withdrawing Life-sustaining TherapyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1991
- Withholding and Withdrawal of Life Support from the Critically IllNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990