The role of temporal segmentation markers in discourse processing
- 1 May 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Discourse Processes
- Vol. 19 (3) , 385-406
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544924
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that temporal expressions like around 2 o'clock and then are used by speakers and writers to signal thematic shift and that and is used to signal continuity in narratives. This article focuses on the comprehension function of these markers. The role of the markers was investigated by measuring the availability of words from the preceding text. Results from three experiments suggest that temporal markers modify the availability of preceding words. Segmentation markers like around 2 o'clock and then reduce this availability, whereas continuity markers like and improve this availability. These results are compatible with the hypothesis that segmentation markers lead readers to not integrate new information with preceding information, but to put the new information into a separate structure.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Time, space, and action: Exploring the narrative structure and its linguistic markingDiscourse Processes, 1994
- Monotonic hypotheses in multiple group designs: A Monte Carlo study.Psychological Bulletin, 1993
- Discourse organization in the comprehension of temporal order in narrative textsDiscourse Processes, 1992
- Review articleLinguistics, 1991
- The role of interclausal connectives in narrative structuring: Evidence from adults' interpretations of simple storiesDiscourse Processes, 1991
- Lexical cohesion and specialized knowledge in science and popular science textsDiscourse Processes, 1991
- Text-signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processesEducational Psychology Review, 1989
- What do paragraph markings do?Discourse Processes, 1988
- Conjunctions and the recall of composite sentencesJournal of Memory and Language, 1988
- The connective ‘and’: do older children use it less as they learn other connectives?Journal of Child Language, 1987