Effect of Difficulty Affording Health Care on Health Status After Coronary Revascularization

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Background— An objective of the United States’ Healthy People 2010 Initiative is to eliminate disparities based on socioeconomic status. We assessed the effect of difficulty affording health care on the health status (symptoms, function, and quality of life) of patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention or CABG. Methods and Results— A consecutive, single-center cohort of 480 patients undergoing coronary revascularization received the Seattle Angina Questionnaire at the time of their procedure and at subsequent monthly intervals for 6 months. At baseline, patients who reported somewhat of a burden to a severe burden in affording health care had significantly lower scores on the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (mean±SD) with respect to angina (55±29 versus 68±25, P P P P =0.002; physical function 61±2.7 versus 80±2.0, P P P =0.47; physical function 75±3.4 versus 81±2.2, P =0.13; quality of life 84±3.1 versus 84±2.0, P =0.81). Similar differences remained after adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics. Conclusions— Patients reporting difficulty affording health care have worse health status at the time of coronary revascularization. A persistent disparity exists after percutaneous but not surgical revascularization. Additional inquiry into the mechanism of this disparity is needed so that the goals of equitable health care, irrespective of treatment strategy, can be achieved.

This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit: