Using Put Warrants to Reduce Corporate Financing Costs
Preprint
- 1 January 2000
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
We show that put warrants can reduce financing costs when managers know more about the firm's future prospects than do outside investors. Put warrants are shown to be an efficient security in eliminating adverse selection costs in that firms can credibly reveal favorable private information without having to resort to "money burning" or inefficient investment decisions. Among the model's implications are that (i) put warrants are effective whether or not they are attached directly to equity shares, (ii) the number of puts issued must exceed the number of new shares issued, and (iii) a ceiling exists on the amount of project financing that a firm can successfully raise. Additionally our analysis provides practical insights into how the size and exercise price of the put warrant offering affect issues such as corporate control and the probability of default.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pricing the strategic value of putable securities in liquidity crisesJournal of Financial Economics, 2001
- Chapter 31 Seasoned equity offerings: A surveyPublished by Elsevier ,1995
- Chapter 23 Financing investment under asymmetric informationPublished by Elsevier ,1995
- Adverse selection and the rights offer paradoxJournal of Financial Economics, 1992
- Capital Structure and Dividend Irrelevance with Asymmetric InformationThe Review of Financial Studies, 1991
- Signalling by underpricing in the IPO marketJournal of Financial Economics, 1989
- The Resolution of Financial DistressThe Review of Financial Studies, 1989
- Efficient Financing under Asymmetric InformationThe Journal of Finance, 1987
- Efficient Signalling with Dividends and InvestmentsThe Journal of Finance, 1987
- Signaling Games and Stable EquilibriaThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1987