What accuracy statistics really measure
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- Published by Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) in IEE Proceedings - Software
- Vol. 148 (3) , 81-85
- https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-sen:20010506
Abstract
The paper aims to provide the software estimation research community with a better understanding of the meaning of, and relationship between, two statistics that are often used to assess the accuracy of predictive models: the mean magnitude relative error, MMRE, and the number of predictions within 25% of the actuals, pred(25). It is demonstrated that MMRE and pred(25) are, respectively, measures of the spread and the kurtosis of the variable z where z=estimate/actual. Thus, z is considered to be a measure of accuracy, and statistics such as MMRE and pred(25) to be measures of properties of the distribution of z. It is suggested that measures of the central location and skewness of z, as well as measures of spread and kurtosis, are necessary. Furthermore, since the distribution of z is non-normal, non-parametric measures of these properties may be needed. For this reason, boxplots of z are useful alternatives to simple summary metrics. It is also noted that the simple residuals are better behaved than the z variable, and could also be used as the basis for comparing prediction systems.Keywords
This publication has 1 reference indexed in Scilit:
- Experience with the accuracy of software maintenance task effort prediction modelsIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1995