A Comparative, Double-blind, Randomised Trial of a New Second Generation LMWH (Bemiparin) and UFH in the Prevention of Post-operative Venous Thromboembolism
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Vol. 83 (04) , 523-529
- https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1613856
Abstract
A randomised, prospective, double-blind trial was performed, to compare the safety and efficacy of a new low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) Bemiparin and standard unfractionated heparin (UFH), for the prophylaxis of postoperative venous thromboembolism. 300 patients scheduled to undergo elective hip arthroplasty were included. The principal outcome measures were the incidence of thromboembolic events and bleeding complications. 149 patients received 3,500 anti-Xa IU of bemiparin plus a placebo injection daily and 149 patients received 5,000 IU of UFH twice a day. The two groups were similar with respect to factors likely to affect the risk of developing post-operative venous thromboembolism (VTE) and risk of bleeding events. During the post-operative period, 34 patients developed VTE complications; 9 (7.2%) in the bemiparin group and 25 (18.7%) in the UFH group. VTE in the two groups was statistically significant (OR of 2.96; 95% CI 1.32-6.62 and p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the frequency of bleeding complications: major bleeding requiring discontinuation of prophylaxis, (OR 1.21; 95% CI 0.36-4.05; p = 1.00), the measured median operative blood loss (p = 0.77) or the median postoperative drain loss (p = 0.97), and the number of patients who developed wound haematoma (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.31-2.46; p = 1.00). A comparison of coagulation parameters on the preoperative day with post-operative day 2 ± 1, day 6 ± 1 and day of discharge showed a significantly higher AT concentration, anti-factor Xa activity and TFPI levels in the bemiparin group when compared with UFH. This study demonstrates that bemiparin, in a single daily subcutaneous dose of 3,500 anti-Xa IU in high risk patients undergoing hip arthroplasty is more effective than UFH administered twice daily at a dose of 5,000 IU in the prevention of postoperative VTE. Both agents are equally safe. List of participants, their affiliations and current addresses are listed in the appendix on p. 528Keywords
Funding Information
- The Bemiparin Collaborative Assessment Group
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The role of bone traumatization in the initiation of proximal deep vein thrombosis during cemented hip replacement surgery in pigsBlood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis, 1995
- Increased activation of coagulation and formation of late deep venous thrombosis following discontinuation of thromboprophylaxis after hip replacement surgeryThrombosis Research, 1995
- Anticoagulants and Spinal-Epidural AnesthesiaAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1994
- Low molecular weight versus standard heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after major abdominal surgeryThe Lancet, 1993
- Low molecular weight heparin in prevention of perioperative thrombosis.BMJ, 1992
- Low molecular weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis and epidural/spinal anaesthesia – is there a risk?Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1992
- Studies on coagulation, fibrinolysis, kallikrein-kinin and complement activation in systemic and pulmonary circulation during hip arthroplasty with acrylic cementThrombosis Research, 1988
- Heparin induces release of extrinsic: Coagulation pathway inhibitor (EPI)Thrombosis Research, 1988
- Femoral vein thrombosis and total hip replacement.BMJ, 1977
- Evaluation of an amidolytic heparin assay method: Increased sensitivity by adding purified antithrombin IIIThrombosis Research, 1977