Abstract
Performance of infants in a speech‐sound discrimination task (/ba/ vs /da/) was measured at three stimulus intensity levels (50, 60, and 70 dB SPL) using the operant head‐turn procedure. The procedure was modified so that data could be treated as though from a single‐interval (yes–no) procedure, as is commonly done, as well as if from a sustained attention (vigilance) task. Discrimination performance changed significantly with increase in intensity, suggesting caution in the interpretation of results from infant discrimination studies in which only single stimulus intensity levels within this range are used. The assumptions made about the underlying methodological model did not change the performance–intensity relationships. However, infants demonstrated response decrement, typical of vigilance tasks, which supports the notion that the head‐turn procedure is represented best by the vigilance model. Analysis then was done according to a method designed for tasks with undefined observation intervals [C. S. Watson and T. L. Nichols, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 5 9, 655–668 (1976)]. Results reveal that, while group data are reasonably well represented across levels of difficulty by the fixed‐interval model, there is a variation in performance as a function of time following trial onset that could lead to underestimation of performance in some cases.