Toward a Theory of Social Support: Closing Conceptual Gaps
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Social Issues
- Vol. 40 (4) , 11-36
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1984.tb01105.x
Abstract
We define social support as “an exchange of resources between two individuals perceived by the provider or the recipient to be intended to enhance the well‐being of the recipient.” We then discuss the assumptions and implications of this definition and address several gaps in the support literature. Specifically, we consider the costs and benefits of supportive exchanges for both participants, the dual and possibly incongruent perceptions of support held by the provider and the recipient, and the importance of non‐network sources of support. In addition, we distinguish between the health‐sustaining versus health‐compensating functions of support and how these functions link with the resources provided in supportive exchanges. We next address the factors that can influence support effects and suggest a broad range of outcomes for both the provider and the recipient. Finally, we distinguish the dimensions of support from the contextual variables that can influence its quality and effectiveness.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social Support: Methodological Issues in Design and MeasurementJournal of Social Issues, 1984
- Social support and well-being: Implications for prevention programsJournal of Prevention, 1982
- Supportive Networks: Life Ties for the ElderlyJournal of Social Issues, 1980
- The Aversive Effects of Nonreciprocated BenefitsSocial Psychology Quarterly, 1979
- Interpersonal Relationships and Cancer: A Theoretical AnalysisJournal of Social Issues, 1979
- Reactions to Receiving Aid as a Function of Cost to Donor and Opportunity to Aid1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1974
- The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary StatementAmerican Sociological Review, 1960
- A Theory of Social Comparison ProcessesHuman Relations, 1954
- Social Pressures in Informal GroupsThe American Catholic Sociological Review, 1950