On sample size for sensitivity and specificity in prospective diagnostic accuracy studies
- 27 July 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 23 (16) , 2537-2550
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1836
Abstract
The design of a study of disease screening tests may be based on hypothesis tests for the sensitivity and specificity of the tests. The case‐control study requires knowledge of the disease status of patients at the time of enrollment. This may not be possible in a prospective setting, when the gold standard is obtained subsequent to the initial screening and the number of diseased individuals is random and can not be fixed by design. Several ad hoc procedures for determining the total sample size are commonly used by practitioners, for example, the prevalence inflation method. The properties of these methods are not well understood. We develop a formal method for sample size and power calculations based on the unconditional power properties of the test statistics. The approach provides novel insights into the behaviour of the commonly used methods. We find that the ad hoc prevalence inflation method may serve as a useful approximation to our rigorous framework for sample size determination in the prospective set‐up. The design of a large population‐based study of mammography for breast cancer screening illustrates the key issues. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prospective studies of diagnostic test accuracy when disease prevalence is lowBiostatistics, 2002
- Statistical Methods in Diagnostic MedicinePublished by Wiley ,2002
- Sample size calculations for comparative studies of medical tests for detecting presence of diseaseStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Numerical OptimizationPublished by Springer Nature ,1999
- COMPARING NEW AND OLD SCREENING TESTS WHEN A REFERENCE PROCEDURE CANNOT BE PERFORMED ON ALL SCREENEESAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1987
- Sample Size for Testing Differences in Proportions for the Paired-Sample DesignBiometrics, 1987
- Asymptotic and Exact Power for the McNemar Test and Its Analogue with R Controls Per CasePublished by JSTOR ,1984
- The Determination of Sample Sizes for Use with the Exact Conditional Test in 2 x 2 Comparative TrialsBiometrics, 1973
- The Matched Pairs Design in the Case of All-or-None ResponsesBiometrics, 1968