Do Doctors and Patients Agree?: Views of the Outcome of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- general essays
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Vol. 7 (4) , 533-544
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462300007091
Abstract
In an attempt to establish the extent to which patients and doctors agree on the outcome of health care, the pre- and postoperative states of health of 388 men undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate for benign disease were studied. Generally, high levels of concordance (>70%) were obtained. The strongest agreement was for clearly defined events, such as episodes of acute retention (95%); the weakest agreement occurred over the most subjective symptoms, prognostic expectations, and ambiguous terms (around 60%). The level of agreement was not associated with any characteristics of the patient, surgeon, or treatment.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Doctors' versus patients' evaluation of results after neurosurgery.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1989
- Self-care among older adultsSocial Science & Medicine, 1989
- Comparisons between the self-assessed and observer-assessed presence and severity of coldsSocial Science & Medicine, 1989
- Self-rated health: a predictor of mortality among the elderly.American Journal of Public Health, 1982
- Health in Old Age: How Do Physicians' Ratings and Self-ratings Compare ?Journal of Gerontology, 1979
- Self-assessment of health status a longitudinal study of selected elderly subjectsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1964
- Controlled Trial of Vagotomy and Gastro-enterostomy, Vagotomy and Antrectomy, and Subtotal Gastrectomy in Elective Treatment of Duodenal Ulcer: Interim ReportBMJ, 1964
- Some Correlates of Differences in Self-assessment of Health Status Among the ElderlyJournal of Gerontology, 1962
- An Analysis of the Validity of Health QuestionnairesSocial Forces, 1958