Oesophagectomy practice and outcomes in England
- 19 April 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 94 (5) , 585-591
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5805
Abstract
Background The 2001 UK National Health Service guidance on improving outcomes recommended centralization of oesophageal resection. The aim of this study was to analyse national trends in oesophageal resection in England to determine whether centralization has occurred and its impact on outcomes. Methods The study used data from Hospital Episode Statistics for 1997–1998 to 2003–2004 and included patients who had resection for oesophageal cancer. The annual hospital volume was grouped into five categories based on the recommendation for annual volume for a designated centre. Results A total of 11 838 oesophageal resections were performed. The total number of hospitals performing resections decreased, mainly owing to a fall in the number of very low-volume hospitals (117 in 1997 to 45 in 2003). The proportion of resections performed in very high-volume hospitals increased from 17·8 per cent during 1997–1999 to 21·9 per cent during 2002–2003 (P < 0·001). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 10·1 per cent, with a significant reduction over time (from 11·7 to 7·6 per cent; P < 0·001). The decline in mortality rate may be due to increased numbers of patients undergoing surgery in higher-volume hospitals. There was an increase in the annual number of new patients from 5672 to 6230 during the study, although a fall in the proportion of resections from 31·5 to 26·0 per cent (P < 0·001). Conclusion Centralization and multidisciplinary team expertise partly explain the improvement in mortality rate, but changes in preoperative selection also play a part.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variation in activity rates of consultant surgeons and the influence of reward structures in the English NHSJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2004
- Use of mortality rate after aortic surgery as a performance indicatorBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- The effect of age on the outcome of surgical treatment for carcinoma of the oesophagus and gastric cardia☆European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2003
- Cohort study in South and West England of the influence of specialization on the management and outcome of patients with oesophageal and gastric cancersBritish Journal of Surgery, 2002
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Histologic Tumor Type Is an Independent Prognostic Parameter in Esophageal Cancer: Lessons From More Than 1,000 Consecutive Resections at a Single Center in the Western WorldAnnals of Surgery, 2001
- Hospital volume and hospital mortality for esophagectomyCancer, 2001
- Exclusive radical surgery for esophageal adenocarcinomaCancer, 2001
- Transhiatal Esophagectomy: Clinical Experience and RefinementsAnnals of Surgery, 1999
- Assessing the performance of NHS Hospital Trusts: the role of ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ informationHealth Policy, 1999