Analysis of the Experimental Meaning of Coherent Superposition and the Nonexistence of Superselection Rules
- 15 June 1970
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review D
- Vol. 1 (12) , 3349-3363
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.1.3349
Abstract
The experimental meaning of coherent superposition of state vectors is analyzed. It is shown that the involvement of the measuring instrument is of basic importance and that it is erroneous to study superposition without it. From this analysis it is found that there are no such things as superselection rules. The meaning of the sign change of spinors under rotation is considered, and it is found to have experimental consequences. The nonmeasurability of the relative parity of states with different components of angular momentum is shown. An appendix discusses the application of some of the considerations of the paper to decaying states and elementary particles.
Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coherent Superposition of Charge StatesPhysical Review B, 1969
- Is the sign change of spinors under 2π rotations observable?Journal of Physics A: General Physics, 1969
- Proof of the Fermion Superselection Rule without the Assumption of Time-Reversal InvarianceJournal of Mathematical Physics, 1968
- Critical Remark on the Observability of the Sign Change of Spinors under2πRotationsPhysical Review B, 1968
- Minimum Uncertainty Product, Number-Phase Uncertainty Product, and Coherent StatesJournal of Mathematical Physics, 1968
- Does Charge Obey a Superselection Rule?Physical Review Letters, 1967
- Observability of the Sign Change of Spinors underRotationsPhysical Review B, 1967
- Charge Superselection RulePhysical Review B, 1967
- Coherent States and the Forced Quantum OscillatorAmerican Journal of Physics, 1965
- The Intrinsic Parity of Elementary ParticlesPhysical Review B, 1952