Style and Function: A Fundamental Dichotomy
- 1 April 1978
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Antiquity
- Vol. 43 (2) , 192-202
- https://doi.org/10.2307/279244
Abstract
Our understanding of the archaeological record has been developed under the culture history paradigm. Its fundamental structure is shown to be stylistic; this characteristic, coupled with historical factors, is seen as the major reason why evolutionary processes have not been extensively employed in explaining cultural change. Consideration of an evolutionary approach suggests that such processes as natural selection have considerable explanatory potential, but it is also suggested that a substantial segment of the archaeological record is not best understood in terms of adaptation. The potential of an evolutionary approach cannot be realized without making a fundamental distinction between functions, accountable in terms of evolutionary processes, and style, accountable in terms of stochastic processes.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Models for the Methodology of MouthtalkSouthwestern Journal of Anthropology, 1969
- The Machalilla Culture: An Early Formative Complex on the Ecuadorian CoastAmerican Antiquity, 1962
- Analogy in Archaeological InterpretationSouthwestern Journal of Anthropology, 1961
- The Type-Variety Method of Ceramic Classification as an Indicator of Cultural PhenomenaAmerican Antiquity, 1960
- The New American ArcheologyScience, 1959
- On the Interpretation of Archeological Evidence in Historical and Sociological Terms1American Anthropologist, 1956
- On the Concept of TypesAmerican Anthropologist, 1954
- Statistical Techniques for the Discovery of Artifact TypesAmerican Antiquity, 1953
- Some Basic Methodological Problems in PrehistorySouthwestern Journal of Anthropology, 1952
- The Typological ConceptAmerican Antiquity, 1944