Automatic monitoring of forecast errors
- 1 January 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Forecasting
- Vol. 2 (1) , 1-21
- https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3980020103
Abstract
This paper evaluates a variety of automatic monitoring schemes to detect biased forecast errors. Backward cumulative sum (cusum) tracking signals have been recommended in previous research to monitor exponential smoothing models. This research shows that identical performance can be had with much simpler tracking signals. The smoothed‐error signal is recommended for α = 0.1, although its performance deteriorates badly as α is increased. For higher α values, the simple cusum signal is recommended. A tracking signal based on the autocorrelation in errors is recommended for forecasting models other than exponential smoothing, with one exception. If the time series has a constant variance, the backward cusum should give better results.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Feedback Model for Automated Real Estate AssessmentManagement Science, 1977
- Monitoring Schemes in Short-term ForecastingJournal of the Operational Research Society, 1976
- DETECTION OF TURNING POINTS IN A TIME SERIESDecision Sciences, 1971
- Monitoring an Exponential Smoothing Forecasting SystemJournal of the Operational Research Society, 1969
- Monitoring a Forecasting SystemJournal of the Operational Research Society, 1964
- The Use of Cumulative Sum (Cusum) Techniques for the Control of Routine Forecasts of Product DemandOperations Research, 1964
- When and How to Use Cu-Sum ChartsTechnometrics, 1963
- Average Run Lengths in Cumulative Chart Quality Control SchemesTechnometrics, 1961
- Sampling inspection of continuous processes with no autocorrelation between successive resultsBiometrika, 1960
- CONTINUOUS INSPECTION SCHEMESBiometrika, 1954