Origin and Evolution of the Lichenized Ascomycete Order Lichinales: Monophyly and Systematic Relationships Inferred from Ascus, Fruiting Body and SSU rDNA Evolution
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Plant Biology
- Vol. 3 (2) , 116-123
- https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-12896
Abstract
The Lichinales are a group of lichenized ascomycetes that almost exclusively possess cyanobacteria as their primary photobiont and are hitherto separated from the Lecanorales, the major group of lichenized ascomycetes, by thallus structure, ascoma ontogeny, ascus structure and ascus function. The relationship of the two families Peltulaceae and Lichinaceae, both placed within the Lichinales, with the Heppiaceae, placed within the Lecanorales, was investigated, as well as a possible sister group relationship of the Lichinales to the Lecanorales. Phylogenetic analyses included non‐molecular data as well as 18S rDNA sequence data. The monophyly of the Lichinales including the family Heppiaceae and a sister group relationship of Lichinales and Lecanorales, based on the shared presence of lecanoralean asci, are proposed in a morphological hypothesis. Parsimony and distance analyses of 18S rDNA sequence data strongly support the monophyly of the Lichinales, including all three families. Therefore, the presence of rostrate, lecanoralean asci in Peltula and part of the Lichinaceae suggests that this ascus type is an autapomorphy of the monophyletic Lichinales. Furthermore, the occurrence of prototunicate asci in the Heppiaceae and most of the Lichinaceae is autapomorphic and was gained independently by reduction of the rostrate ascus. The 18S rDNA analysis did not reject the non‐molecular hypothesis of a sister group relationship of the Lichinales and the Lecanorales as based on ascus characters. The alternative placement of the Lichinales as the sister group of all inoperculate euascomycetes excluding the Sordariomycetes and most of the Leotiales in the gene tree received unsufficient bootstrap support and no support from any non‐molecular data and consequently was rejected.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phylogenetic Analyses of the Fungi Based on Large rDNA Data SetsMycologia, 2000
- Molecular Evidence for Recognizing the ChaetothyrialesMycologia, 1998
- Phytogeny and evolution of Caliciaceae, Mycocaliciaceae, and Sphinctrinaceae (Ascomycota), with notes on the evolution of the prototunicate ascusCanadian Journal of Botany, 1997
- Loculoascomycete origins and evolution of filamentous ascomycete morphology based on 18S rRNA gene sequence dataMolecular Biology and Evolution, 1996
- Neolecta, a fruit-body-producing genus of the basal ascomycetes, as shown by SSU and LSU rDNA sequencesMycological Research, 1996
- Morphological data, molecular data, and total evidence in phylogenetic analysisCanadian Journal of Botany, 1995
- The New Lichen family Gloeoheppiaceae and its Genera Gloeoheppia, Pseudopeltula and Gudelia (Lichinales)The Lichenologist, 1995
- Phylogeny of Discomycetes and Early Radiations of the Apothecial Ascomycotina Inferred from SSU rDNA Sequence DataExperimental Mycology, 1995
- Lepraria in the British IslesThe Lichenologist, 1992
- LIC volume 24 issue 4 Cover and Front matterThe Lichenologist, 1992