How Can we Translate Good Science into Good Perinatal Care?
- 1 June 1986
- Vol. 13 (2) , 83-90
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536x.1986.tb01013.x
Abstract
Scientific skepticism, known more formally as the discipline of epidemiology, can help overcome five obstacles that impede perinatal care: seduction by authority, the false idol of technology, letting sleeping dogmas lie, the pursuit of pedantry, and numerators in search of denominators. When the seduction by authority is strong, epidemiology shows us how to judge data on their own merit and not on the stature of their proponent. Epidemiology teaches us that we need not blindly worship technology; that technology can be our servant, not our master. Epidemiology compels us to rouse those slumbering dogmas and make them prove their merit. Despite the powerful lure of medical pedantry, epidemiology shows us the way out of this multiple‐choice mentality. When we are still stinging from our last unpleasant case, epidemiology guides and sustains us through science, reason, and logic—rather than through clinical impression.This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Squatting in Childbirth A New Look at an Old TraditionJournal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 1985
- Benefits and Risks of EpisiotomyObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1983
- The Ethics of the Randomized Clinical TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Down's syndrome. Recent trends in the United StatesJAMA, 1981
- HealersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Evaluation of Medical PracticesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Electronic Fetal MonitoringObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1979
- The physician. The key to the clinical application of scientific informationJAMA, 1977
- Medicine and society--past, present, and future.BMJ, 1971
- THE ERRORS OF MEDICINEThe Lancet, 1970