Communication, Negotiation, and Mediation: Dealing with Conflict in End-of-Life Decisions
Open Access
- 1 October 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Palliative Care
- Vol. 16 (1_suppl) , S17-S23
- https://doi.org/10.1177/082585970001601s05
Abstract
In recent years, it has become possible for the end of life to be a negotiated event, particularly in the intensive care unit. A multitude of often unidentified and poorly understood factors affect such negotiations. These include, family dynamics, ever-changing health care teams, inconsistent opinions about prognosis, and cultural differences between physicians, and patients and their families. When these factors converge, conflict may erupt. This article explores the nature, antecedents, and cost of such conflict. Arguments for the importance of balanced communication, negotiation, and mediation in end-of-life care are put forward.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient decision-making: medical ethics and mediation.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1996
- Physician characteristics associated with decisions to withdraw life support.American Journal of Public Health, 1995
- Patient control over dying: Responses of health care professionalsSocial Science & Medicine, 1993
- Coping with ambiguity and uncertainty in patient-physician relationships: III. NegotiationJournal of Medical Humanities, 1992
- Ethical IssuesDimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 1991
- Crisis theory: a paradigm of effective intervention with families of critically ill peopleJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1990
- Family illness paradigms: Evolution and significance.Family Systems Medicine, 1987