Comparison of the reflex responses elicited by stimulation of the separately perfused carotid and aortic body chemoreceptors in the dog
- 1 January 1966
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Physiology
- Vol. 182 (2) , 379-403
- https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007828
Abstract
In dogs under chloralose and urethane anesthesia, the carotid and aortic bodies were isolated from the circulation and separately perfused with blood, the composition of which could be controlled at will. The remainder of the systemic circulation was perfused at constant blood flow, thereby enabling the reflex vascular responses to be determined. The systemic venous blood was oxygenated in the isolated perfused lungs of a 2nd dog and the PO2 [O2 tension] and PCO2 [CO2 tension] of the systemic arterial blood was maintained constant. Using hypoxic hypercapnic blood to stimulate the arterial chemoreceptors, carotid body excitation in spontaneously breathing animals caused an increase in respiratory minute volume approximately 7 times larger than that evoked by stimulation of the aortic bodies. Whereas the hyperpnea of carotid body origin is due to an increase in rate and depth of breathing, that from the aortic bodies is due predominantly to an increase in respiratory frequency. Stimulation of the carotid bodies in spontaneously breathing animals caused small variable changes in systemic vascular resistance, whereas stimulation of the aortic bodies invariably increased the vascular resistance. When pulmonary ventilation was maintained constant, the vascular response to stimulation of the carotid bodies was considerably modified in that constriction invariably occurred; that from the aortic bodies, however, was little affected. There was now no significant difference in the size of responses from the 2 groups of chemoreceptors. These constrictor responses represent the primary vascular effects. A similar modification of the carotid body vascular response occurred in the spontaneously breathing animal after denervation of the lungs, and is due to abolition of a lung-inflation vasodilator reflex. The size of the primary vasoconstrictor responses from the carotid and aortic bodies is reduced by lowering the arterial blood PCO2. The results indicate that there is a fundamental difference in the functions of the carotid and aortic bodies. They exert a quantitatively similar primary control of the ''vasomotor centre'' which is in striking contrast to the relatively more powerful influence on respiration by the carotid bodies. In the spontaneously breathing animal, however, the primary vasoconstrictor response from the carotid bodies is offset to a varying degree by the lung-inflation vasodilator reflex initiated by the concomitant hyperpnoea. This is not evident with the aortic bodies because of the relatively weaker respiratory response they evoke.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The heart rate responses to carotid body chemoreceptor stimulation in the catThe Journal of Physiology, 1964
- Reflex pulmonary vasoconstriction due to stimulation of the aortic body by nicotineAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1964
- Intercostal muscle spindle activity and its γ-motor controlThe Journal of Physiology, 1963
- The cardiovascular responses to stimulation of the carotid body chemoreceptors in the dogThe Journal of Physiology, 1963
- The effects of stimulation of the carotid body chemoreceptors on the pulmonary vascular bed in the dog: the ‘vasosensory controlled perfused living animal’ preparationThe Journal of Physiology, 1959
- Stretch Reflexes from the Dog's Lung to the Systemic CirculationCirculation Research, 1959
- Accuracy of Blood ph and Pco2 DeterminationsJournal of Applied Physiology, 1956
- THE EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON THE pH OF BLOOD AND PLASMA IN VITROJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1948
- ANALYZER FOR ACCURATE ESTIMATION OF RESPIRATORY GASES IN ONE-HALF CUBIC CENTIMETER SAMPLESJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1947
- THE LOCATION AND FUNCTION OF THE CHEMORECEPTORS OF THE AORTAAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1939