The weakness of strong ties: Collective action failure in a highly cohesive group*
- 1 April 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Mathematical Sociology
- Vol. 21 (1-2) , 3-28
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250x.1996.9990172
Abstract
Following Homans, exchange theorists have modeled informal social control as an exchange of peer approval for compliance with group obligations. The exchange model predicts higher compliance in cohesive networks with strong social ties. However, previous specifications failed to incorporate bilateral exchange of approval. Computer simulations using a Bush‐Mosteller stochastic learning model show that bilateral exchanges evolve more readily than multilateral, causing social control to flow into the maintenance of interpersonal relationships at the expense of compliance with group obligations, a structural form of the “second‐order free‐rider problem.”Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Artificial Social IntelligenceAnnual Review of Sociology, 1994
- Backward-Looking Social ControlAmerican Sociological Review, 1993
- Exclusion and Power: A Test of Four Theories of Power in Exchange NetworksAmerican Sociological Review, 1993
- Generalized Exchange and Social DilemmasSocial Psychology Quarterly, 1993
- Collective Action and Group Heterogeneity: Voluntary Provision Versus Selective IncentivesAmerican Sociological Review, 1993
- Individual, Collective, and Systems Rationality in Work Groups: Dilemmas and Market-Type SolutionsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1992
- Collective Action and the Second-Order Free-Rider ProblemRationality and Society, 1989
- Rewards and Punishments as Selective Incentives for Collective Action: Theoretical InvestigationsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1980
- The Strength of Weak TiesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1973
- Social Pressures in Informal GroupsThe American Catholic Sociological Review, 1950