FORUM: HOW MANY HIDDEN SPECIES ARE THERE? AN APPLICATION OF THE PHYLOGENETIC SPECIES CONCEPT TO GENETIC DATA FOR SOME COMPARATIVELY WELL KNOWN BEE “SPECIES”
- 1 August 1997
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Canadian Entomologist
- Vol. 129 (4) , 587-594
- https://doi.org/10.4039/ent129587-4
Abstract
Estimates of global species richness for insects are based upon extrapolations from “known” to unknown faunas and hence rely upon accurate counts of species for the referrent taxon or region. The number of reference species depends upon the species concepts employed by workers in that group combined with the degree to which nonstandard (i.e. nonmorphological) approaches have been used. Genetic data are more directly applicable to the detection of the apparent absence of gene flow, which lies at the heart of any species concept, than is morphological information. But what criteria can be used as a practical guide to suggest the absence of gene flow and define species-level units? Minimally, the phylogenetic species concept requires that there be one fixed difference between two samples for them both to be considered discrete species. The assumptions accompanying this definition include the survey of sufficient geographic locations, loci, and individuals. Based upon six studies of mostly widespread, readily identifiable and well-investigated bee “species”, we estimate that the number of species currently recognised may underestimate the true figure by half (although for at least two of the studies localities have been undersampled and more collections are needed). Even when examples for which there are fewer than five fixed differences between samples are removed from the data set, the number of recognised species increases by perhaps as much as 50% (the same caveat regarding undersampling of populations still applies). We suggest that the presence of morphologically unrecognised species may be more common among widespread, easily identified “species” than is generally accepted. Whether or not similar levels of species underestimation apply to other faunas, such as tropical rainforest canopy beetles, remains to be investigated.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimates of heterozygosity in two social insects using a large number of electrophoretic markersHeredity, 1992
- Genetic variability in the social bee Lasioglossum marginatum and a cryptic undescribed sibling species, as detected by DNA fingerprinting and allozyme electrophoresisInsect Molecular Biology, 1992
- How Many Species Are There?: RevisitedConservation Biology, 1991
- A lesser predilection for bugs: Hemiptera (Insecta) diversity in tropical rain forestsBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1991
- AN AMPLIFICATION OF THE PHYLOGENETIC SPECIES CONCEPTCladistics, 1990
- Neglected taxonomy and continuing extinctions of tuatara (Sphenodon)Nature, 1990
- ALLOZYME VARIATION INHALICTUS RUBICUNDUS(CHRIST): A PRIMITIVELY SOCIAL HALICTINE BEE (HYMENOPTERA: HALICTIDAE)The Canadian Entomologist, 1989
- SOME ARCTIC AND SUBARCTIC SOLITARY BEES COLLECTED AT INUVIK AND TUKTOYAKTUK, NWT, CANADA (HYMENOPTERA: APOIDEA)The Canadian Entomologist, 1986
- Gene Diversity in HymenopteraEvolution, 1985
- Haploidploidy and the Evolution of the Social InsectScience, 1976