Identity and Non-Identity Thinking: Dialectical Critique of the Transaction Cost Theory of the Modern Corporation
- 1 December 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Management
- Vol. 13 (4) , 661-673
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638701300407
Abstract
Identity thinking is the dominant mode of thinking in the management and social sciences. This paper contends that identity thinking is a mode of reasoning that contains certain inherent biases that inevitably lead to a partisan construal of the management research agenda. The prejudicial tendencies of identity thinking are prevalent in Chandler's and Williamson's theories of the origins and evolution of the modern corporation. We use the theories both to highlight the operation of identity thinking, and to introduce an alternative: Adorno's negative dialectics.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The role of annual reports in gender and class contradictions at general motors: 1917–1976Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1987
- Theories of the state and the state of accounting: Economic reductionism and political voluntarism in accounting regulation theoryJournal of Accounting and Public Policy, 1984
- The normative origins of positive theories: Ideology and accounting thoughtAccounting, Organizations and Society, 1982
- The organization of work a comparative institutional assessmentJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1980
- Markets, Bureaucracies, and ClansAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1980
- Towards a political economy of accounting: An empirical illustration of the cambridge controversiesAccounting, Organizations and Society, 1980
- Alfred Chandler's New Business History: A ReviewPolitics & Society, 1980
- Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual RelationsThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1979
- The Problem of Social CostThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1960
- The Nature of the FirmEconomica, 1937