Measuring disease impact in disabling neurological conditions: are patientsʼ perspectives and scientific rigor compatible?
- 1 December 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Current Opinion in Neurology
- Vol. 15 (6) , 721-724
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00019052-200212000-00010
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The SF-36 in multiple sclerosis: why basic assumptions must be testedJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2001
- Evidence-based measurementNeurology, 2001
- Item Response Theory and Health Outcomes Measurement in the 21st CenturyMedical Care, 2000
- Response to Hays et al and McHorney and Cohen: Emergence of Item Response Modeling in Instrument Development and Data AnalysisMedical Care, 2000
- Response to Hays et al and McHorney and Cohen: A Discussion of Item Response Theory and Its Applications in Health Status AssessmentMedical Care, 2000
- Equating Health Status Measures With Item Response TheoryMedical Care, 2000
- Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteriaClinical Therapeutics, 1996
- Training in measurement: Always the bridesmaid.American Psychologist, 1991
- SOLVING MEASUREMENT PROBLEMS WITH THE RASCH MODELJournal of Educational Measurement, 1977
- Item Bank using Sample-free CalibrationNature, 1968