Facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health
Open Access
- 24 February 2010
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Public Health
- Vol. 10 (1) , 1-10
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-95
Abstract
Evidence-informed decision making is accepted in Canada and worldwide as necessary for the provision of effective health services. This process involves: 1) clearly articulating a practice-based issue; 2) searching for and accessing relevant evidence; 3) appraising methodological rigor and choosing the most synthesized evidence of the highest quality and relevance to the practice issue and setting that is available; and 4) extracting, interpreting, and translating knowledge, in light of the local context and resources, into practice, program and policy decisions. While the public health sector in Canada is working toward evidence-informed decision making, considerable barriers, including efficient access to synthesized resources, exist. In this paper we map to a previously developed 6 level pyramid of pre-processed research evidence, relevant resources that include public health-related effectiveness evidence. The resources were identified through extensive searches of both the published and unpublished domains. Many resources with public health-related evidence were identified. While there were very few resources dedicated solely to public health evidence, many clinically focused resources include public health-related evidence, making tools such as the pyramid, that identify these resources, particularly helpful for public health decisions makers. A practical example illustrates the application of this model and highlights its potential to reduce the time and effort that would be required by public health decision makers to address their practice-based issues. This paper describes an existing hierarchy of pre-processed evidence and its adaptation to the public health setting. A number of resources with public health-relevant content that are either freely accessible or requiring a subscription are identified. This will facilitate easier and faster access to pre-processed, public health-relevant evidence, with the intent of promoting evidence-informed decision making. Access to such resources addresses several barriers identified by public health decision makers to evidence-informed decision making, most importantly time, as well as lack of knowledge of resources that house public health-relevant evidence.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accessing pre-appraised evidence: fine-tuning the 5S model into a 6S modelEvidence-Based Nursing, 2009
- A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategiesImplementation Science, 2009
- Evidence-Based Public Health: A Fundamental Concept for Public Health PracticeAnnual Review of Public Health, 2009
- Use of Research-based Information among Leaders of Public Health AgenciesAmerican Journal of Health Education, 2009
- How Systematic Reviews Can Foster Evidence-Based Clinical DecisionsWorldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 2008
- Of studies, syntheses, synopses, summaries, and systems: the “5S” evolution of information services for evidence-based healthcare decisionsEvidence-Based Nursing, 2007
- Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-makingJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2005
- Evidence-Based Public Health Policy and Practice: Promises and LimitsAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2005
- A Knowledge Transfer Strategy for Public Health Decision MakersWorldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 2004
- health‐evidence.ca: An Innovative Knowledge Source for Health ServicesWorldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 2004