Type a Coronary-Prone Behavior Pattern
- 1 June 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Vol. 8 (2) , 317-323
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167282082020
Abstract
The present study was conducted to examine the relationship of birth order and family size to the Type A coronary-prone behavior pattern. Previous research indicates that parents are more likely to set high, but ambiguous, achievement standards for t-heir first-born children, and to push them harder than later borns. These style differences parallel those proposed for parents of Type A children, suggesting that one factor in the development of Type A behavior may be differential treatment of first versus later borns. Results indicated that Type A individuals are more likely to be first born, and more generally earl)' born, but that this relationship is most true in large families.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measurement of the Type A Behavior Pattern in Children: Assessment of Children's Competitiveness, Impatience-Anger, and AggressionChild Development, 1980
- Type A coronary-prone behavior pattern and social facilitation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980
- Efforts to Control by Children and Adults with the Type A Coronary-Prone Behavior PatternChild Development, 1979
- Caregiver-Child Interactions and the Type A Coronary-Prone Behavior PatternChild Development, 1977
- Coronary Heart Disease in the Western Collaborative Group StudyJAMA, 1975
- Helplessness, stress level, and the coronary-prone behavior patternJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1974
- Birth order and mother-child interaction in an achievement situation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971
- Differences in the behavior of mothers toward first- and later-born children.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967
- Birth order, need achievement, and conformity.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962
- A Theory of Social Comparison ProcessesHuman Relations, 1954