New Labour: a study in ambiguity from a position of ambivalence
- 1 November 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Critical Social Policy
- Vol. 21 (4) , 425-447
- https://doi.org/10.1177/026101830102100402
Abstract
This article represents an attempt to make sense of the contradictions and tensions in the New Labour welfare project. It argues that these can be understood as the product of two characteristics of New Labour, which at best inhibit or even undermine its more progressive policies and at worst result in a more reactionary stance. These are: a populist tendency to woo rather than to lead the electorate and a pragmatic ‘what works’ approach, which avoids a direct assault on structural inequalities. Together these help to explain, in particular, New Labour's ambiguous stance towards redistribution. The final section looks forward, offering a compass to guide New Labour towards a more progressive second term.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Income inequality: What has happened under New Labour?New Economy, 2001
- Child poverty: Aims, achievements and prospects for the futureNew Economy, 2001
- Blair's scarsCritical Social Policy, 2000
- There Goes the Neighbourhood Area policies and social exclusionNew Economy, 1999
- Good-enough Principles for WelfareJournal of Social Policy, 1999
- Inventiveness in politicsEconomy and Society, 1999
- ‘Reforming Welfare Around the Work Ethic’: new gendered and ethical perspectives on work and carePolicy & Politics, 1999
- Doing The Right Thing: Labour’s Attempt to Forge a New Welfare Deal Between the Individual and the StateSocial Policy & Administration, 1999
- Welfare, Neo-Liberalism and New Paternalism: Three Ways for Social Policy in Late Capitalist SocietiesCapital & Class, 1999
- The End of the Welfare State?Social Policy & Administration, 1998