Progesterone Receptor Status Significantly Improves Outcome Prediction Over Estrogen Receptor Status Alone for Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Two Large Breast Cancer Databases
Top Cited Papers
- 15 May 2003
- journal article
- breast cancer
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 21 (10) , 1973-1979
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.09.099
Abstract
Purpose: To determine whether progesterone receptor (PgR) status provides additional value to estrogen receptor (ER) status and improves prediction of benefit from endocrine treatment among patients with primary breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Clinical outcomes of patients in two large databases were analyzed as a function of steroid receptor status. The first database (PP), contained 3,739 patients who did not receive any systemic adjuvant therapy and 1,688 patients who received adjuvant endocrine therapy but no chemotherapy. The second database (SPORE), contained 10,444 patients who received adjuvant endocrine therapy but no chemotherapy. Biochemical ER and PgR assays were identically performed in two different central laboratories. Results: In univariate and multivariate analyses, the prognostic significance of PgR status among systemically untreated patients is modest. Among endocrine-treated patients, however, multivariate analyses, including lymph-node involvement, tumor size, and age, demonstrate that PgR status is independently associated with disease-free and overall survival. For recurrence, the reduction in relative risk (RR) was 25% for ER-positive/PgR-negative patients and 53% for ER-positive/PgR-positive patients, compared with ER-negative/PgR-negative patients (P < .0001, PP patients). Patients with ER-positive/PgR-negative tumors have a reduction in RR of death of 30% (SPORE patients) and 38% (PP patients), compared with patients with ER-negative/PgR-negative tumors (P < .0001). For ER-positive/PgR-positive tumors, the reduction of the risk of death was greater than 46% in SPORE patients and 58% in PP patients, indicating that ER-positive/PgR-positive patients derive more benefit from endocrine therapy (P < .0001). Conclusion: When accurately measured, PgR status is an independent predictive factor for benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy. Therefore, PgR status should be taken into account when discussing RR reductions expected from endocrine treatment with individual patients.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR), by ligand-binding assay compared with ER, PgR and pS2, by immuno-histochemistry in predicting response to tamoxifen in metastatic breast cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group studyInternational Journal of Cancer, 2000
- Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trialsThe Lancet, 1998
- DNA flow cytometry and prognostic factors in 1331 frozen breast cancer specimensCancer, 1988
- Prognostic factors for recurrence and survival in human breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1987
- ADJUVANT TAMOXIFEN IN THE MANAGEMENT OF OPERABLE BREAST CANCER: THE SCOTTISH TRIALThe Lancet, 1987
- Pathologic findings from the national surgical adjuvant breast project (protocol 6). Relation of local breast recurrence to multicentricityCancer, 1986
- Specific progesterone receptors in human breast cancerSteroids, 1975
- Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test ProceduresJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1972
- Regression Models and Life-TablesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1972
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958