Do women ⩾50 years of age need as much screening as women <50 years after they have had negative screening results?
Open Access
- 1 July 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 99 (2) , 239-244
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604455
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of specimen adequacy reproducibility: An Italian experienceDiagnostic Cytopathology, 2003
- Interobserver Reproducibility of Cervical Cytologic and Histologic InterpretationsRealistic Estimates From the ASCUS-LSIL Triage StudyJAMA, 2001
- Trion Inc, USAFiltration Industry Analyst, 1999
- Withdrawing low risk women from cervical screening programmes: mathematical modelling study Commentary: trials versus models in appraising screening programmesBMJ, 1999
- Low efficiency of cytologic screening for cancer in situ of the cervix in older womenInternational Journal of Cancer, 1995
- Strategies for global control of cervical cancerInternational Journal of Cancer, 1995
- Rationale for stopping cervical screening in women over 50.BMJ, 1993
- Who Has Pap Tests?: Variables Associated with the Use of Pap Tests in Absence of Screening ProgrammesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1991
- Observer variability in histopathological reporting of cervical biopsy specimens.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1989
- Screening for squamous cervical cancer: duration of low risk after negative results of cervical cytology and its implication for screening policies. IARC Working Group on evaluation of cervical cancer screening programmes.BMJ, 1986