Mate Selection Among Married and Cohabiting Couples
- 1 April 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Family Issues
- Vol. 21 (3) , 275-302
- https://doi.org/10.1177/019251300021003001
Abstract
This article examines comparative patterns of educational and racial assortative mating or homogamy among married and cohabiting couples and evaluates whether women and men trade in socioeconomic status and racial caste prestige. The 1990 decennial census identifies for the first time individuals in cohabiting relationships. Log-linear models of partner cross-classified data provide several conclusions. First, married and cohabiting couples are highly homogamous with respect to race and education. Second, cohabiting couples are less homogamous than married couples. Third, cohabiting women are less likely than married women to be living with partners with greater education than themselves. Fourth, racially homogamous unions tend to be educationally homogamous and vice versa. Fifth, heterogamous marriages (but not cohabitors) suggest spousal trades: high education in one spouse is associated with higher color status in another. We conclude that research can no longer ignore the qualitatively different mate selection processes of cohabiting couples.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Marital Homogamy in the United States: The Influence of Individual and Paternal EducationSocial Science Research, 1998
- Trends in Black/White IntermarriageSocial Forces, 1993
- Race and the Retreat From Marriage: A Shortage of Marriageable Men?American Sociological Review, 1992
- Shifting Boundaries: Trends in Religious and Educational HomogamyAmerican Sociological Review, 1991
- Status Homogamy in the United StatesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1991
- Marriage Choices in North Carolina and Virginia, 1969-71 and 1979-81Journal of Marriage and Family, 1989
- The Analysis of Cross-Classified Data Having Ordered Categories.Published by JSTOR ,1987
- Changing Places: Conjugal Careers and Women's Marital MobilitySocial Forces, 1986
- Mate Selection Differentials Between Whites and Blacks in the United StatesSocial Forces, 1980
- The Theoretical Importance of LoveAmerican Sociological Review, 1959