Functional Independence Measure versus Short Form-36: relative responsiveness and validity
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in International Journal of Rehabilitation Research
- Vol. 24 (1) , 65-68
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-200103000-00009
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Uniform Data System for Medical RehabilitationAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 2000
- Test-Retest Performance of a Mailed Version of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Among Older AdultsMedical Care, 1996
- Reliability and validity of the FIM for persons aged 80 years and above from a multilevel continuing care retirement communityArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1996
- What Is the Best Way of Assessing Outcome After Total Knee Replacement?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1996
- The SF-36 health survey: a valid measure of changes in health status after injury.Injury Prevention, 1996
- Predicting quality-of-life outcomes following total joint arthroplasty: Limitations of the SF-36 health status questionnaireThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1995
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of Data Quality, Scaling Assumptions, and Reliability Across Diverse Patient GroupsMedical Care, 1994
- A validation of the Functional Independence Measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatientsArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1993
- Functional Scoring of Multi-Trauma PatientsPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1991
- Outcome of patients with hip fracture treated by physical therapy in an acute care hospitalTopics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 1990