Public Safety Legislation and the Risk Compensation Hypothesis: The Example of Motorcycle Helmet Legislation
- 1 June 1983
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy
- Vol. 1 (2) , 193-203
- https://doi.org/10.1068/c010193
Abstract
The ‘experiment’ in the United States of America in which twenty-eight states in the latter half of the 1970s repealed their laws which made the wearing of motorcycle helmets compulsory is widely believed to have proved conclusively that helmet legislation is a highly effective public health measure. The principal statistical foundations of this belief are found in a report to Congress by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and in a study by Watson et al. These foundations are examined and found to be open to criticism. The evidence surveyed here suggests that the effect, if any, of helmet legislation on motorcycling fatalities is perverse. The ‘risk compensation theory’ is proffered as a possible explanation of the available evidence.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Efficacy of Seat Belt LegislationSAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility, 1982
- Helmet use, helmet use laws, and motorcyclist fatalities.American Journal of Public Health, 1981
- A grim experiment.BMJ, 1980
- The repeal of helmet use laws and increased motorcyclist mortality in the United States, 1975-1978.American Journal of Public Health, 1980
- Driver Reaction to a Technical Safety Measure—Studded TiresHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1976
- The Effects of Automobile Safety RegulationJournal of Political Economy, 1975