Sevoflurane Versus Desflurane for Outpatient Anesthesia
- 1 December 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 81 (6) , 1186-1190
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199512000-00012
Abstract
The recovery characteristics of desflurane and sevoflurane were compared when used for maintenance of ambulatory anesthesia.After obtaining informed consent, 42 healthy, unpremedicated women undergoing laparoscopic sterilization procedures were studied. Anesthesia was induced with propofol, 1.5-2.0 mg/kg, and maintained with either desflurane 3%-6% (n = 21) or sevoflurane 1%-2% (n = 21) with 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Intraoperative analgesia and neuromuscular block was achieved using fentanyl and vecuronium, respectively. The inhaled anesthetics were titrated to achieve an adequate clinical "depth of anesthesia" and to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) within 20% of the preinduction baseline values. Visual analog scales (VAS) and the digit-symbol substitution test (DSST) were performed preoperatively and at 30-min intervals during the recovery period. There were no differences between the two groups in the total doses of propofol, fentanyl, or vecuronium. Heart rate (HR) values were lower in the sevoflurane group during the induction-to-incision period. However, HR and MAP were otherwise similar during the maintenance and recovery periods. Use of desflurane led to a more rapid emergence (4.8 +/- 2.4 vs 7.8 +/- 3.8 min) and shorter time to extubation (5.1 +/- 2.2 vs 8.2 +/- 4.2 min) compared to sevoflurane (mean values +/- SD). Intermediate recovery times, postoperative VAS and DSST scores, and side effects were similar in the two treatment groups. Although sevoflurane was associated with a slower emergence from anesthesia than desflurane after laparoscopic surgery, recovery of cognitive function and discharge times were similar in the two anesthetic groups. Thus, it would appear that sevoflurane is an acceptable alternative to desflurane for maintenance of outpatient anesthesia. However, the pharmacoeconomic impact (if any) of the slower emergence with sevoflurane is yet to be determined. (Anesth Analg 1995;81:1186-90)Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rapid Increase in Desflurane Concentration Is Associated with Greater Transient Cardiovascular Stimulation Than with Rapid Increase in Isoflurane Concentration in HumansAnesthesiology, 1994
- New Inhaled AnestheticsAnesthesiology, 1994
- Sympathetic Hyperactivity during Desflurane Anesthesia in Healthy VolunteersAnesthesiology, 1993
- Elderly patients recover more rapidly from desflurane than from isoflurane anesthesiaJournal of Clinical Anesthesia, 1992
- RECOVERY OF COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS AFTER ANAESTHESIA WITH DESFLURANE OR ISOFLURANE AND NITROUS OXIDE †British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1992
- Clinical Comparison of Sevoflurane and Isoflurane in Healthy PatientsAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1992
- Comparison of Induction, Maintenance, and Recovery Characteristics of Sevoflurane-N2O and Propofol-Sevoflurane-N2O With Propofol-Isoflurane-N2O AnesthesiaAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1992
- Use of Desflurane for Outpatient Anesthesia A Comparison with Propofol and Nitrous OxideAnesthesiology, 1991
- Recovery Profile after Desflurane—Nitrous Oxide Versus Isoflurane—Nitrous Oxide in OutpatientsAnesthesiology, 1991
- Desflurane and Isoflurane in Surgical PatientsAnesthesiology, 1991