Adjuvant reactivity predicts survival in patients with “high‐risk” primary malignant melanoma treated with systemic BCG
- 15 November 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 28 (5) , 543-550
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910280503
Abstract
We report the prognostic importance of strength of reaction to BCG, tumor histology and clinical factors in patients with previously untreated high‐risk (Clark, III, IV and V) primary malignant melanoma. One hundred and one such patients received high‐dose BCG (1 × 108viable units) by Heaf gun as an adjuvant to standardized primary surgery according to EORTC Protocol 18741. Univariate analysis of disease‐free interval (DFI) indicates that the degree of maximum reaction to BCG (p= 0.0003), Breslow thickness (p= 0.0003) and Clark level (p= 0.002) are highly significant prognostic factors. When a multivariate model using Cox's proportional hazard regression was used for DFI, the degree of maximum reaction to BCG and Breslow thickness were by far the most significant criteria. A prognostic equation was obtained to predict DFI from maximum BCG reaction and Breslow thickness. From analysis of the “scores” calculated in this way it appears that the two variables act independently. This technique permits the determination of values that are predictive of DFI and discriminate between subgroups of patients with different DFI characteristics (5 groups,p< 0.0001). This exercise was repeated for survival and similar results were obtained. The degree of a patient's immune reaction to BCG administered therapeutically is of paramount importance in determining the likelihood of survival. This factor and the Breslow thickness can be integrated to produce a mathematical equation which accurately predicts survival for appropriately treated melanoma patients.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognosis of stage I melanoma of the skin. Who collaborating centres for evaluation of methods of diagnosis and treatment of melanomaInternational Journal of Cancer, 1980
- Difficulties encountered in the application of clark classification and the Breslow thickness measurement in cutaneous malignant melanomaInternational Journal of Cancer, 1980
- Tumor thickness as a guide to surgical management of clinical stage I melanoma patientsCancer, 1979
- Assessment of prognosis in cutaneous malignant melanomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1977
- Analysis of Survival Data under the Proportional Hazards ModelInternational Statistical Review, 1975
- BCG stimulation of immune responsiveness in patients with malignant melanoma.Preliminary reportCancer, 1973
- Thickness, Cross-Sectional Areas and Depth of Invasion in the Prognosis of Cutaneous MelanomaAnnals of Surgery, 1970
- Impaired immunologic reactivity and recurrence following cancer surgeryCancer, 1970
- METHOD OF ASSESSING PROGNOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH MALIGNANT MELANOMAThe Lancet, 1968
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958