Developing performance indicators for local government: The Scottish experience
- 1 April 1994
- journal article
- quality
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Public Money and Management
- Vol. 14 (2) , 37-43
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09540969409387813
Abstract
The Value for Money (VFM) approach to public sector finance, together with the Citizen's Charter, has placed considerable emphasis on developing performance indicators (PIs) for evaluating local government. Despite the publicity given to the approach by some practitioners and consultants, the state of the art is primitive and fraught with methodological problems. The conventional wisdom is to recognize these and argue for refinement. However, current PIs are inadequate as the basis for inter‐authority comparison, and should be more appropriately termed ‘local government statistics’. The reality is that the methodology of VFM is less developed than its terminology.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- CHANGE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICESPublic Administration, 1992
- LEARNING TO MEASURE PERFORMANCE: THE USE OF INDICATORS IN ORGANIZATIONSPublic Administration, 1991
- The management of performance in the public sectorPublic Money and Management, 1988
- Measuring Government PerformanceThe Political Quarterly, 1988
- New directions in local accountability: Can the people be trusted?Public Money and Management, 1988
- Public management: A third approach?Public Money and Management, 1988
- ACCOUNTING FOR THE AUDIT COMMISSIONThe Political Quarterly, 1988
- Measuring Performance: A New System for the National Health ServicePolicy & Politics, 1985
- From Programme Budgeting to Policy Analysis: Corporate Approaches in Local GovernmentPublic Administration, 1980
- The Science of "Muddling Through"Public Administration Review, 1959