Constraints on the Validity of Computer Diagnosis
- 1 August 1974
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of General Psychiatry
- Vol. 31 (2) , 197-203
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1974.01760140049008
Abstract
Issues in the constraints on the validity of computerized psychiatric diagnosis are illustrated by the analysis of diagnoses produced by treating clinicians, expert diagnosticians, and the DIAGNO III computer diagnostic system. The results indicate modest agreement between the computerized diagnoses and both clinicians and experts, and not much better agreement between the experts and between the treating clinicians. The main constraint on the validity of computerized diagnoses is not in any inherent limitation on computer processing but rather in the limitations of the current diagnostic system itself. Improvements in computer diagnosis await improvements in the diagnostic system, along the lines of simplification, explicit criteria, and limitation of the categories to those conditions for which validity evidence exists.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of ReliabilityEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1973
- DIAGNO II: Further Developments in a Computer Program for Psychiatric DiagnosisAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1969
- A Model for Psychiatric DiagnosisArchives of General Psychiatry, 1966
- A pattern probability model for the classification of psychiatric patientsBehavioral Science, 1963
- Classification Procedures Based on Bayes's FormulaJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1960
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960
- The Utilization of Multiple Measurements in Problems of Biological ClassificationJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1948
- THE USE OF MULTIPLE MEASUREMENTS IN TAXONOMIC PROBLEMSAnnals of Eugenics, 1936