Five-Hour Diagnosis of Dermatophyte Nail Infections with Specific Detection ofTrichophyton rubrum
- 1 April 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 45 (4) , 1200-1204
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.02072-06
Abstract
A rapid two-step DNA extraction method and a multiplex PCR for the detection of dermatophytes in general and Trichophyton rubrum specifically were developed and evaluated with DNA extracted from pure cultures and from clinically diseased nails. DNA from the following dermatophytes was used: Epidermophyton floccosum, Microsporum audouinii, Microsporum canis, Microsporum gypseum, Microsporum nanum, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton schoenleinii, Trichophyton soudanense, Trichophyton terrestre, Trichophyton tonsurans, Trichophyton verrucosum, and Trichophyton violaceum. Human DNA and DNA from the following nondermatophyte fungi were included as controls: Alternaria, Aspergillus niger, Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida krusei, Malassezia furfur, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Scopulariopsis brevicaulis. A total of 118 nail samples received for routine microscopy and culture for dermatophytes were subsequently tested by the two PCRs separately and in a multiplex format. Using DNA extracted from pure cultures and the pan-dermatophyte PCR, the T. rubrum-specific PCR sequentially and in a multiplex format correctly detected all dermatophytes and additionally correctly identified T. rubrum. Comparison of the traditional diagnostic evaluation (microscopy and culture) of nail samples with PCR on DNA directly extracted from the nails showed excellent agreement between PCR and microscopy, but the number of samples with dermatophyte species identification was increased considerably from 22.9% to 41.5%, mainly due to the identification of T. rubrum by PCR in microscopy-positive but culture-negative samples. In conclusion, this 5-hour diagnostic test was shown to increase not only the speed but also the sensitivity of investigation for nail dermatophytosis.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Forty-Eight-Hour Diagnosis of Onychomycosis with Subtyping ofTrichophyton rubrumStrainsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2006
- Causative agents of onychomycosis — a retrospective studyJDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, 2006
- Onychomycosis in Adana, Turkey: A 5-year studyInternational Journal of Dermatology, 2005
- Retrospective study of onychomycosis in Italy: 1985–2000Mycoses, 2005
- Onychomycosis in Denmark: prevalence of fungal nail infection in general practiceMycoses, 2004
- PCR Fingerprinting for Identification of Common Species of DermatophytesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- Survey of Dermatophyte Infections in the Lausanne Area (Switzerland)Dermatology, 2002
- The future of onychomycosis therapy may involve a combination of approachesBritish Journal of Dermatology, 2001
- Non-dermatophytes in onychomycosis of the toenailsBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1997
- Onychomycosis, Tinea Pedis and Tinea Manuum Caused by Non‐Dermatophytic Filamentous Fungi Nicht‐Dermatophyten‐Fadenpilze als Erreger von Onychomykosen, Tinea pedis und Tinea manuumMycoses, 1989