Investment Behavior, Observable Expectations, and Internal Funds
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2006
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 96 (3) , 796-810
- https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.3.796
Abstract
We use earnings forecasts from securities analysts to construct a new measure of the neoclassical fundamentals that drive investment spending. We find that investment responds significantly to our new measure of fundamentals but is insensitive to cash flow, even for firms typically thought to be liquidity constrained. These results have two key implications. First, fundamentals may be more important for investment spending than would be suggested by the results to date from investment-q models. Second, the positive cash-flow effects obtained in such models may reflect a failure to control properly for fundamentals rather than the presence of financial constraints.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- The impact of negative cash flow and influential observations on investment–cash flow sensitivity estimatesJournal of Banking & Finance, 2004
- Financial frictions and investment: requiem in QReview of Economic Dynamics, 2003
- The Level and Persistence of Growth RatesThe Journal of Finance, 2003
- How Sensitive Is Investment to Cash Flow When Financing Is Frictionless?The Journal of Finance, 2003
- Measurement Error and the Relationship between Investment andqJournal of Political Economy, 2000
- The Relationship between Firm Investment and Financial StatusThe Journal of Finance, 1999
- Analyst Forecasting Errors and Their Implications for Security Analysis: An Alternative PerspectiveCFA Magazine, 1996
- Investment and Tobin's QJournal of Econometrics, 1992
- Alternative non-nested specification tests of time-series investment modelsJournal of Econometrics, 1988
- The Financial Valuation of the Return to CapitalBrookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1980