Opinions of attorneys and law enforcement personnel on the accuracy of eyewitness identifications.
- 1 January 1983
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 7 (4) , 337-349
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01044736
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Eyewitness identification: What can a psychologist tell a jury?American Psychologist, 1983
- The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications.Law and Human Behavior, 1983
- Recognition of Faces: Own‐Race Bias, Incentive, and Time Delay1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1982
- Do jurors share a common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior?Law and Human Behavior, 1982
- Can people detect eyewitness-identification accuracy within and across situations?Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981
- Perspectives on the impact of lineup composition, race, and witness confidence on identification accuracy.Law and Human Behavior, 1980
- Cross-racial Recognition and Age: When You're Over 60, Do They Still "All Look Alike?"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1979
- Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979
- Do “They all look alike?” The Effect of Race, Sex, Experience, and Attitudes on the Ability to Recognize Faces1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1978
- Recognition for faces of own and other race.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969